** Click here for Episode 190 **
I’m going to steer clear of the buses in Seattle, after this question from Joe in Seattle:
Answer me this: would you rather sit directly beside a naked man on the bus or a fully-clothed man with his wiener hanging out?
I’d go for the naked man, because I’d assume he was either a harmless naturist, or a groom from a 1980s wedding farce who’s managed to unchain himself from the lamppost and swim back to the mainland, and is now on the bus to his own wedding where he has to stop the bride saying ‘I do’ to the evil best man who has sabotaged him thus.
Whereas a man who was clothed but whose wiener was unleashed, I would assume that he was keeping it easily accessible as he finds buses sexually arousing. I don’t want to sit next to anyone who finds public transport erotically stimulating. Nor would I want to be there when he finished.
But readers, how about you?
Subscribe with iTunes • Book • Question Archive • Episodes • Merch
• iPhone App • Android App • Facebook • Twitter • YouTube • FAQ
Answer Me This! Podcast 
September 9, 2011 at 9:36 am |
There is a third scenario explored in the film Breaking the Waves – in that you are in a more proactive role that at least makes an old man very happy.
A friend, no really a friend, got caught out in the 1980s when Harrods ran a poster campaign that used the tube sign format with ‘Harrods’ where the station name would normally be. He got into the habit while commuting by tube of resting his eyes until his station which happened to be Knightsbridge. Waking he saw ‘Harrods’ and in his sleepy and confused state leapt to his feet to disembark but his usual cycle of sleeping and waking had been interrupted and a large trouser tent was evident. Recumbent it might have instead described as a sail – and as we all know there is only one Harrods sale.